Search for: "Stevenson v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 259
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2015, 2:29 am
 Dr Stevenson was an author of a paper relied on as a part of the state of the art. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:52 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Garske (United States)III.C        Views of Law and the Cities·         The Interaction between Non-Judicial Mechanisms of Conflict Resolution and the State: the Case Study of Maputo, Concetta Tina Lorizzo, University of Cape Town (South Africa)·         Plurality and the City, Julian Sidoli del Ceno, Birmingham City University (United… [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am by bradhendrickslawfirm
’s care and stated that she did not have the financial resources to continue that care without James’s help. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:14 pm by Beard Stacey & Jacobsen, LLP
Their lawsuit states that closing the air station violates the Coast Guard’s legacy missions including marine safety, search and rescue, and aids to navigation. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:14 pm by Beard Stacey & Jacobsen, LLP
Their lawsuit states that closing the air station violates the Coast Guard’s legacy missions including marine safety, search and rescue, and aids to navigation. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 11:11 am by Michael Stevens
Commonwealth (criminal law – the psychiatric access nurse was not a state actor and, therefore, the use of Chris’s statement did not violate Chris’s right to remain silent);  Stevenson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 7:23 am by Joy Waltemath
The IWCA is very clear, explained the court, that the employee had a right to secure his own medical provider without interference “in any manner whatsoever,” and he was fired for exercising that right (Stevenson v FedEx Ground Package System, Inc, September 24, 2014, Tharp, J, Jr). [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:11 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Stevenson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:12 am by Amy Howe
At Lawfare, Ingrid Wuerth discusses last week’s opinion in Bond v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 12:54 pm by Sean Hanover
Although failure to provide a breath sample is manifest expression of "consciousness of guilt" (see Stevenson v. [read post]