Search for: "Strong v. Cook*"
Results 81 - 100
of 474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2021, 3:29 am
This argument was founded on the Court of Appeal’s judgment in the case of Gulati v MGN, which concerned systematic phone hacking by journalists from the Mirror Group. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
" Pollard is a strong, principled voice in this field and has some excellent perspectives on Florida law. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:38 am
Plaintiff loses the case.The case is Bjorklund v. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:30 am
Strong brands as a barrier to entry, this time from "The Economist" | UK IPO publishes consultation on implementing Trade Mark Directive 2015 into UK law | Top 10 issues from submissions before UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert v Actavis second medical use battle | EPO looking for new legally qualified members of the Boards of Appeal | Repair or reconstruction: Where do you draw the line for exhaustion under patent law? [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
Privacy Shield: Toward a Strong Personal Data Protection Between The US and the EU? [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 5:56 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:16 pm
We continue our previews of the civil cases accepted for review in the closing days of the Illinois Supreme Court’s March term with Harris v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
But as I have argued elsewhere Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito have pretty strong originalist tendencies. [1] Even if these latter justices respect precedent more, they follow originalism in cases of first impression, as in NLRB v. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 3:22 am
Already at the TRO/PI stage she expressed her discomfort with a decision in Epic v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
Digital developments continue to highlight that strong, proportionate and effective data protection has never been more important. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
Strong brands as a barrier to entry, this time from "The Economist" | UK IPO publishes consultation on implementing Trade Mark Directive 2015 into UK law | Top 10 issues from submissions before UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert v Actavis second medical use battle | EPO looking for new legally qualified members of the Boards of Appeal|Repair or reconstruction: Where do you draw the line for exhaustion under patent law? [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:21 am
Kovac v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 2:44 pm
For me, the case is largely about the strong presumption that the listed inventors are correct. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 4:34 am
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Rostami v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:59 am
Play a Strong Hand; Bluffing in Litigation Can Be Costly The second point is for employers. [read post]