Search for: "Strong v. Cook*"
Results 81 - 100
of 520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 2:42 am
These strong interests survived the negotiation of the 1999 Montreal Convention, now part of EU law as the Montreal Regulation. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 10:58 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
For example, years ago our client was severely beaten in his home by a furniture deliveryman who became annoyed by the strong smell of cooking fish in the home. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
In the closing days of the March term, the Illinois Supreme Court declined an invitation to recognize the privilege in Harris v. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 5:33 am
Pittman v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Wheelahan v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:19 pm
Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit, based in Boston, ruled on June 9 in Cook v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
Jewel v NSA, First Unitarian Church v NSA, and Smith v Obama in the Ninth Circuit A week after the Wikimedia ruling, the U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
, Wellman v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:30 pm
Marshall Leaffer then took the audience through some 9th Circuit dilution decisions, leading with Visa v JSL Corp 610 F3d 1088 (2010) which affirmed that dilution was a question of fact, not law, and that, where a strong mark such as VISA is at stake, summary judgment is highly appropriate. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:29 am
This argument was founded on the Court of Appeal’s judgment in the case of Gulati v MGN, which concerned systematic phone hacking by journalists from the Mirror Group. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
" Pollard is a strong, principled voice in this field and has some excellent perspectives on Florida law. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:38 am
Plaintiff loses the case.The case is Bjorklund v. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:30 am
Strong brands as a barrier to entry, this time from "The Economist" | UK IPO publishes consultation on implementing Trade Mark Directive 2015 into UK law | Top 10 issues from submissions before UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert v Actavis second medical use battle | EPO looking for new legally qualified members of the Boards of Appeal | Repair or reconstruction: Where do you draw the line for exhaustion under patent law? [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
Privacy Shield: Toward a Strong Personal Data Protection Between The US and the EU? [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:16 pm
We continue our previews of the civil cases accepted for review in the closing days of the Illinois Supreme Court’s March term with Harris v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 5:56 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
But as I have argued elsewhere Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito have pretty strong originalist tendencies. [1] Even if these latter justices respect precedent more, they follow originalism in cases of first impression, as in NLRB v. [read post]
