Search for: "Turner v. Smith"
Results 81 - 100
of 162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
The Claimants Michael Turner and Nikki Sanderson have sought permission to appeal the damages they were awarded. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:08 pm
Redhail, and Turner v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
” (Turner Broad Sys Inc v FCC (1997)). [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:32 pm
; Stewart v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 5:11 pm
"In Washinton v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:14 am
(Al) Smith Ltd. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:56 am
Scot Kraeuter, Savage Turner Pinson & Karsman, Savannah, Martin S. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:09 am
He wrote the most on-point opinion, Garcetti v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am
The trial in Small v Turner is due to commence before Tugendhat J on the same date. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 10:55 am
The fifth board of Appeal rejected the request for invaliditation of the Polo/Lauren Logo as it was based only upon an industrial design right which ceased to be valid due to its not renewal.In CJEU: "EZMIX" devoid of distinctive character and descriptive for software used in music production Nedim Malovic reports on the CJEU's decision in C-48/18, underlying that once again the CJEU made it cleat that only decisions on point of law may be subject to appeal to the Court.If you… [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:56 am
I think it is fair to say that Turner J was annoyed. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
” The Open File blog looks at Turner v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:47 pm
A child support fight is the background in Turner v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 6:57 am
Whitt v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:16 am
” Certified Conflict Case Davis v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
On 25 April 2013, there was a Pre Trial Review in the case of Small v Turner. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The EEOC Determined in Mia Macy v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court’s 1987 decision in Turner v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
PUBLISHED OPINIONS Opinion Short Title/District 08a0415p.06 Smith v. [read post]
