Search for: "U. S. v. Perez"
Results 81 - 100
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am
Grischuk's convenience. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:29 am
In Matter of Michael R v Amanda R, ___AD3d___, 2019 WL 4264401 (1stDept., 2019) the first and only day of trial on the father’s enforcement petition took place on February 2, 2016 before the Support Magistrate. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Chapter Readings· U. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 11:24 am
Instead, such ploys are an F-U to constituents who critically depend on Section 230 to achieve their life goals. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Perez v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
S. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 8:15 pm
’” Perez v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
Perez. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Perez v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
” The Prager U v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
”Then there’s the question of scope. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Perez v. [read post]
