Search for: "U.S. v. Santana"
Results 81 - 100
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2007, 5:44 am
Gates, 462 U.S. at 230. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am
Harvest (U.S.) [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:47 am
Morales-Santana, an appeal by the federal government, seeks to defend the constitutionality of less favorable treatment, for purposes of U.S. citizenship, of a child born abroad whose father is a U.S. citizen than the treatment given to a child born abroad whose mother is a U.S. citizen. ** Ivy v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:16 pm
” Finally, in Morales-Santana v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm
Manhattan U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:32 am
The U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am
” At ACS, Sandra Park looks at Lynch v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:45 pm
Santana v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
Graham, 490 U.S. at 396; Cunningham v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 12:50 pm
See Santana-Diaz v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
What Does the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
Morales-Santana, an equal protection challenge to a federal nationality statute that sets different standards for transmitting citizenship to a child born abroad to unmarried parents depending on whether the mother or the father was a U.S. citizen. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:40 pm
Attorney Rodríguez-Vélez. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:57 am
Morales-Santana, an equal protection challenge to a federal nationality statute that sets different standards for transmitting citizenship to a child born abroad to unmarried parents depending on whether the mother or the father was a U.S. citizen. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:00 am
Santana Vélez, 177 D.P.R. 61 (2009). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 10:03 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
Santana supra at 212-213; See, Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 3:22 pm
Morales-Santana (November 9; granted June 28): Whether a federal law that, for purposes of U.S. citizenship, treats a child born abroad whose father is a U.S. citizen differently from a child born abroad whose mother is a U.S. citizen violates the Constitution. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:15 am
Santana, 6 F.3d 1, 11 (1st Cir. 1993). [read post]
