Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION" Results 81 - 100 of 132
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
   However, since 2005, many of the issues addressed in these reports have been resolved in court cases, such as by the Supreme Court in KSR International v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm by Joe Wallin
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
The Human Rights Act had not been passed when I was at school and I did not know any law, so an application to the International Criminal Court was out of the question. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
– Business Wire, May 4, 2010 Navistar International Corporation /quotes/comstock/13*! [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
  “Nudging” consumers towards better media choices isn’t based on clear science about, say, eating better or getting more exercise, but on highly subjective decisions about what kind of information consumption is really good for individuals, communities, and polities. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
In the process, these changes have saved lives here in the United States and abroad, and prevented countless injuries. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(Inventive Step) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses W D Washington on rare interference ruling: Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Cardiac Science Operating Company (Washington State Patent Law Blog) CAFC: Design patents – symmetry requires elimination of points-of-novelty test for anticipation: International Seaway Trading Corp. v Walgreens Corporation (Patently-O) (IP Osgoode) CAFC: Means plus function claim element does not cover… [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
Hyundai Motor America (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Cal App 4th guidance on pre-discovery trade secret disclosures: Perlan Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]