Search for: "United States v. Apple Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2010, 10:51 am by Gene Quinn
These so-called false marking cases arise from 35 USC § 292, and were given new life thanks to a Federal Circuit decision from December of 2009 --- The Forest Group Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 11:07 am by INFORRM
In the Courts The case of Apple v Epic has concluded with Judge Yvonne Gonzales Rogers granting a permanent injunction that said Apple will no longer be allowed to prohibit developers providing links or other communications that direct users away from in app purchasing. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm by Luke Hawthorne (AU)
  Source: Apple Inc. v Registrar of Trade Marks [2014] FCA 1304 [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm
The United States as amicus curiae suggested a test, see Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 27–29, but Samsung and Apple did not brief the issue. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:26 am by Florian Mueller
Approximately 18 hours ago, a clerk's notice already mentioned the possibility of Epic Games' antitrust action against Apple over its App Store terms and policies being reassigned to Oakland-based United States District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
“This case,” Apple’s lawyers said, “presents issues of surpassing importance to the United States economy. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:36 pm by Gene Quinn
On Friday, August 27, 2010, Interval Research Corporation (a Paul Allen non-practicing entity) brought a patent infringement lawsuit against a who’s who of tech companies in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle, specifically suing AOL, Inc., Apple, Inc., eBay, Inc., Facebook, Inc., Google Inc., Netflix, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., OfficeMax Inc.,… [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 12:26 am by Florian Mueller
It told the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that it had "conferred with Appellee International Trade Commission and Intervenor Apple Inc., and neither party object[ed] to the requested voluntary dismissal. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm by Beth Hutchens
Shortly thereafter, it filed a trademark application for “APP STORE” in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:45 pm by Bevin Newman and Thomas Dillickrath
The United States Supreme Court’s single antitrust case of the 2019 term, Apple, Inc v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
The petition of the day is: Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 10:35 pm by Florian Mueller
The flurry of Ericsson-Apple filings with the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), a U.S. trade agency with the quasi-judicial power to U.S. import bans, continued yesterday. [read post]