Search for: "United States v. Apple Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 898
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by Kristian Soltes
The bill would ban all mergers and acquisitions for companies with over $100 billion in values, the release stated. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 9:35 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“[B]uyer’s remorse, without more, is not a cognizable injury under Article III of the United States Constitution. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 7:53 am by Dennis Crouch
Whether the equities lie considerably against granting mandamus, United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 3:46 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the entry of summary judgment by the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
To state the same proposition in the negative, on the assumption that Twitter Inc. has no physical or business presence in Canada, I do not see in this case how B.C. law could be applied to tweets relayed by Twitter and published in the United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 8:02 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
United States, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018), which held that the acquisition of cell-site location information was a Fourth Amendment search). [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 8:02 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
United States, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018), which held that the acquisition of cell-site location information was a Fourth Amendment search). [read post]
”[8] The Louisiana expense attribution provisions outlined above are based on federal tax  provisions aimed at preventing United States taxpayers from claiming deductions for amounts incurred to generate income not included in federal taxable income by the United States.[9]  There are two Internal Revenue Code  (“Code”) provisions on which the Louisiana law is based: Section 265, which addresses the treatment of interest expense… [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
When faced with a “one bad apple” gives every investor a rescission right, defense counsel frequently interpose “estoppel” or similar equitable defenses. [read post]