Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 81 - 100 of 4,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Reading Hanen’s lengthy, often strident opinions on the deferred action initiatives has long had a Groundhog’s Day quality, since in many respects the core substantive issues in the litigation have not changed very much over the years. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
D827,946 for a “Pet Grooming Glove,” a design that was allegedly already in circulation in the United States before the patent application. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Index Newspapers v City of Portland, 3:20-cv-1035-SI, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon has entered a temporary restraining order that blocks federal law enforcement officers from arresting or using physical force against journalists and legal observers as they respond to anti–police brutality protests there. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 8:51 pm by Tim Banks @TM_Banks
Very recently, the Supreme Court of Canada reiterated that the underlying values of dignity, integrity and autonomy are fostered by protecting a biographical core of personal information from the state (R. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 2:10 pm
United States, 2009 WL 235674 (Feb. 3, 2009), the Circuit held that defendant's ineffective assistance claim in his untimely supplemental memorandum and his right-to-appeal claim in his original habeas motion were tied to a common core of operative facts. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:23 am by Michael M. O'Hear
Congress passed the Implementation Act in 1998 in order to give the Convention effect in the United States. [read post]
As reported in our previous blogpost, on 7 October 2022, the US White House published an Executive Order on enhancing safeguards for United States signals intelligence activities (EO). [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 12:56 pm by Steven Cohen
Core Consulting Group – United States District Court – District of Minnesota – July 26th, 2017) involves a consulting agreement between the plaintiff (MSI) and the defendant (Core) for the former to possibly pursue an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 11:18 am by Ingrid Wuerth
 As in Sachs, the only connection to the United States was the ticket purchase, which the D.C. [read post]