Search for: "United States v. Doles"
Results 81 - 100
of 247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2016, 8:07 am
Engraving from Frank Leslie's Illustrated NewspaperThus, the Collector of Customs becomes President of the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:26 pm
United States, which addresses the seemingly mundane question of the legal and existential nature of the humble toilet paper holder. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
” In U.S. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:00 pm
Perhaps the single most beneficial piece of legislation that the United States Congress has enacted during my lifetime is the Bayh-Dole Act, codified in Chapter 18 of Title 35 of the United States Code, enacted in 1980 and named after co-sponsored Senators Birch Bayh of Indiana and Robert Dole of Kansas. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:35 pm
So now we have Brazil v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
Certiorari-stage documents Petition for certiorari Memorandum for the United States Wetzel v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:18 am
Although the text pretty strongly favors Roche, Stanford and the United States (as amicus) presented a strong policy case for public ownership of publicly funded inventions. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:29 am
In Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (ICSOP) v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 4:52 pm
He and his associates were charged with importing massive amounts of heroin and cocaine and doling out those drugs to dealers. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:32 pm
In Bridge v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 3:21 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:13 am
Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart argued on behalf of the United States in support of Stanford. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
So, waiting for CMS to act, as the United States has urged, is futile, and states would be free from enforcement, public or private, judicial or executive. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
Following up on a campaign pledge to end “sanctuary cities” as part of his immigration policy, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13768, Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:52 am
United States Jaycees; the Court distinguished Matthews v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:15 am
Of the question: Did the Supreme Court Rule in Stanford v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 8:31 am
On implied preemption, the defendant emphasized correctly that only the United States can enforce the FDCA. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, the Supreme Court read the Constitution as forbidding Congress from “commandeering” a state legislature by obligating it to enact a law. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 12:55 am
Plaintiffs naturally look for inspiration to Dole Food Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 12:23 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
