Search for: "United States v. House of Representatives of United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 1:11 pm
" Ed Whelan, who is the guardian of former Justice Scalia's legacy, in National Review Online disagreed with my op-ed by arguing that a State Legislature is only the State House of Representatives and the State Senate and nothing more. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm
One of the plaintiffs is Darth Vader, and the defendant is none other than the most powerful entity in this solar system, the United States of America…! [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
On January 13, 2021, the House of Representative approved an article of impeachment against President Trump that invoked Section 3. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
The United States House of Representatives passed the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act (H.R. 3) by a 251-175 vote last month. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 4:14 pm
Under both constitutions, an impeachment is brought by the lower legislative chamber: the New York Assembly and the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
House of Representatives,[3] no legislation has yet been passed. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 12:26 pm
When SCOTUS granted cert in United States v. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The PROMESA Board Members Are Not "Officers of the United States." So What Are They?
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am
" (We do not think Article I positions, like Representatives, Senators, as well as appointed positions in the Legislative Branch, such as the Clerk of the House and the Secretary of the Senate, are "officers of the United States. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:09 pm
Journal of the House of Representatives(December, 1832) Mr. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:09 am
The lead majority opinion begins, "Both parties to this case are members of the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 10:10 am
The Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:03 pm
On August 17, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City ruled against New York City and in favor of The Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations and the Principal Resident Representative of the Mongolian People's Republic to the United Nations. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:00 pm
The power of each state to set limits on contributions and expenditures shall extend to all elections in that state, including initiative and referendum elections, as well as the power to lower any federal limits for the election of members of Congress to represent the people of that state. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:58 am
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 21, 2012 Mr. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm
[It should be clear, incidentally, that Burns violated the law by fleeing his confinement as a slave, and the august Supreme Court, in the worst single decision in our history, worse even than Dred Scott, upheld the Fugitive Slave Law of 1893 in Prigg v. [read post]
