Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Company" Results 81 - 100 of 509
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2017, 6:26 am by Beth Graham
NLRB, No. 15-60860 (5th Cir., August 7, 2017), an Ohio-based company, Convergys, required all prospective employees to sign a waiver stating the individuals would not engage in collective action against the company. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
<> FRACKING'S MOST WANTED: Report Identifies Top 10 Oil & Gas Companies for Spills & Legal Violations - (April 2, 2015) – Only three out the 36 states with active oil and gas operations make information about companies' spills and legal violations easily available to the public, according to a report by the Natural Resources Defense Council and FracTracker… [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 6:44 am
MacDonald Watson Waste Oil Co., 933 F.2d 35 (1st Cir. 1991) and United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 8:06 am by WIMS
<> United States joins push for transparency in Extractive Industries - The United States is now preparing to participate in the EITI, Clare Short and panelists representing implementing countries, mining companies, and civil society will discuss this and other high profile changes to the transparency regime. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:04 pm by Nadine T. Trinh
” Matador is an oil and gas exploration company that has access to hunting properties in the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
Materials subject to more demanding requirements might be eligible for classification as unavailable, or at least not routinely available, for purposes of the exemption 5 standard. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 8:03 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The judgment debtor acknowledges that it owns assets in the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
 This is very much in evidence in the United States ("The ESG Wars": Presentation of the University of Dundee (Scotland)). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:51 pm by Juan E. Mendez
On the one hand, corporations declare, in cases like Citizens United v. [read post]