Search for: "Verner v. Verner" Results 81 - 97 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am by Marty Lederman
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Verner but had never obtained a right to strict scrutiny of every law in the country. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Verner[20] said was at least constitutionally permissible (even though it wouldn't be constitutionally mandatory here, for reasons discussed in Part II). [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
Several years ago, I published a list of state-specific Family Law blogs. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]