Search for: "Vest v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
The Democrats then could sue Perdue in federal court, citing Bush v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 6:01 pm
App. 453, 574 S.E.2d 595 (2002), the Court made it clear that the Superior Court has the equity power to strip claims from the wrongdoer and to preserve the right of recovery at the same time. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 10:34 am
Last week, in City of San Jose v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm
The court’s ruling essentially invalidates SWRCB’s nearly two-decade-long effort to fill the gap left by the shrinking scope of regulation under the federal Clean Water Act following the Supreme Court’s 2001 decision in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:50 am
The court held that even if in insolvent LLCs no stockholders will enforce fiduciary duties, the General Assembly is vested with the power to make the policy choice, and the courts must honor that choice. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:23 pm
Superior Court (1960) 54 Cal.2d 548, 564.) [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 6:57 am
Gould v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:12 pm
See Collins v. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 2:12 pm
The court rejected this contention, and found that the Superior Court was vested with the subject matter jurisdiction to order McLaughlin to remove the garage pursuant to statute, and McLaughlin admitted he received notice of the April 7, 2014 hearing. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:20 am
In Price v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 8:59 pm
The superior court affirmed both decisions. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 7:38 pm
Id.; see Rosenthal v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 9:09 am
The trial court ruled that section 1009 prevents only recreational use of property from developing into a permanent vested right, following Hanshaw v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
While represented by counsel, the Shireys voluntarily bargained for and agreed upon a settlement on all issues of alimony, child custody and support, and equitable distribution, which was reduced to writing, signed by all parties and was jointly presented to the court and entered as a Consent Order in the Mecklenburg County Clerk of Superior Court on 24 May 2016. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am
There is no superiority/inferiority thing going on here. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 3:24 am
Superior Court by the 55% member, Soroof International Corp., allegedly for mismanagement, incompetence, and looting. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:57 pm
In so holding, the court disapproved the Court of Appeal's decision in McCoy v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:25 pm
Superior Court (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 1159, the court held that “[w]hile there are questions as to whether the issue of furloughs is grievable under the terms of the controlling [MOUs] [fn. omitted], we conclude that any agreement to arbitrate the issue of furloughs would constitute an improper delegation of discretionary policymaking power vested in the City Council. [read post]
