Search for: "Vik Amar"
Results 81 - 100
of 121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2020, 9:05 am
As Vik Amar, Evan Caminker and I recently wrote on this issue:The ACA’s defenders argue that the obvious and compelling indication of congressional preference is what Congress actually did in 2017. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 7:58 pm
Vik Amar’s Columns on Obamacare The Sixth Circuit’s Big Rulings on Obamacare and Affirmative Action, July 8, 2011 Amar discusses the Sixth Circuit’s ruling that upheld Obamacare, focusing on the factors leading to that decision. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:11 pm
On the heels of commentary from individuals like Professor Jerry Organ and Dean Vik Amar, I share the letter I sent to the ABA's Section on Legal Education regarding changes to the Employment Summary Report and the classification of law-school funded positions. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
Why Conant Was Problematic Under First Amendment Theory and Doctrine One of us (Vik Amar) wrote an essay that was rather critical of the Conant case when it came down. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Jason: Vik, as you know, last month three Virginia couples sued their state in federal court challenging a law requiring them to identify and report their race on the state’s marriage license application form. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 7:58 pm
Vik Amar’s Columns on Obamacare The Sixth Circuit’s Big Rulings on Obamacare and Affirmative Action, July 8, 2011 Amar discusses the Sixth Circuit’s ruling that upheld Obamacare, focusing on the factors leading to that decision. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 1:51 pm
In the piece, law professor Vik Amar suggests that "part of the problem may be with the impression of the Ninth Cricuit among students in Ivy League law schools. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:14 pm
UPDATE: As I turns, my opponent in the debate was Professor Vik Amar of UC Davis. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:01 pm
As Vik Amar noted in his piece, clearly four Justices wanted this case. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 11:07 am
The caveat is that some scholars--most notably Professors Akhil Amar and Vik Amar--have argued that the succession statute is unconstitutional because the House Speaker and the President pro tem of the Senate (who is next in line) aren't "officers" within the meaning of the relevant clause of Article II. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 6:22 pm
For a good account of the case, I recommend Vik Amar's FindLaw column (and not just because he credits my "expertly crafted" brief). [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:54 am
Some states, like Wyoming, have very sensible laws (which I, pace Vik Amar, with whom I debated the issue in the Hastings Constitutional Law Journal, believe is perfectly constitional) requiring that the governor pick someone from the deceased senator's own party (indeed, from a list compiled by the state party itself). [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:24 am
And over at the Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Somin responds to an earlier contribution to the symposium from Vik Amar. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm
University of Texas Supreme Court affirmative action case, both Vik Amar (a defender of affirmative action), and leading critics Rick Sander and Stuart Taylor seem to agree on this point. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:15 pm
I asked my colleague Vik Amar--co-author of the best brief in Moore--his thoughts on the possibility of mootness. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
I agree with Akhil and Vik Amar that the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 is not only extremely unwise but quite likely unconstitutional (though, as a practical matter, there is no way of adjudicating the point). [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 11:52 am
Although Vik Amar has argued this limitation is unconstitutional, I disagree (we had a debate about this several years ago in the Hastings Constitutional Law Journal). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:25 pm
Articles from Verdict this year included John Dean’s look at The Tea Party, Neil Buchanan’s piece on tax cuts for the wealthy, Sherry Colb’s examination of whether strip searches by jail officials are constitutional, and Vik Amar and Alan Brownstein’s analysis of the recent Proposition 8 ruling by the California Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 11:03 am
[For more analysis, see Vik Amar's excellent discussion on FindLaw before the dismissals of the suits challenging the DRA.] [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:25 pm
Articles from Verdict this year included John Dean’s look at The Tea Party, Neil Buchanan’s piece on tax cuts for the wealthy, Sherry Colb’s examination of whether strip searches by jail officials are constitutional, and Vik Amar and Alan Brownstein’s analysis of the recent Proposition 8 ruling by the California Supreme Court. [read post]
