Search for: "White v. Johnson" Results 81 - 100 of 962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2018, 8:59 am by Eric Goldman
Aug. 17, 2018) Selected Prior  Posts: * Twitter Isn’t a Shopping Mall for First Amendment Purposes (Duh)–Johnson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:26 am by Jon Hyman
”  Johnson made frequent racial comments, and spoke in a condescending tone when dealing with black union members as compared to white members. [read post]
11 May 2023, 7:38 am by Eric Goldman
Google Twitter Isn’t a Shopping Mall for First Amendment Purposes (Duh)–Johnson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
White and the Legal Tender Cases, as well as his dissenting vote in Bradwell v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:11 am by Kali Borkoski
Whiting may affect the case, and whether S.B. 1070 is likely to survive the Court’s scrutiny if cert. is granted. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:23 am by Bruce Ackerman
With the Civil Rights Act moving forward in the Senate,  the Court refused to undercut the state action doctrine in Bell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 11:30 am by Lowell Brown
” Told through a collection of impressions from Johnson, his aides, members of Congress, and White House reporters, the book is a deep dive inside a “giant of a man” who helped pass more than 200 laws—including landmark civil rights, education, health care, and immigration bills—before the Vietnam War overwhelmed his presidency. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
  To be sure, Southern Democrats deployed other means of suppression to exclude blacks from white primaries until the Civil Rights Revolution enabled Lyndon Johnson to gain decisive Congressional support for the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Supreme Court handed down its decision on the case McCleskey v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm by Francisco Macías
  Still ‘White’ After All These Years:  Mexican Americans and the Politics of Racial Classification in the Federal Judicial Bureaucracy, Twenty-Five Years After Hernández v. [read post]