Search for: "Woodland v. Woodland" Results 81 - 100 of 188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2014, 12:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Daily Democrat recently reported that the City of Woodland, the League of California Cities, and the California State Association of Counties have submitted a May 2, 2014 depublication request to the California Supreme Court regarding the Third District Court of Appeal’s partially-published decision in California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:28 am by Laura Sandwell
On Wednesday 23 October the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: R v Gul, Szepietowski (Nee Seery) v The Serious Organised Crime Agency, In the matter of “The Alexandros T” (Nos. 1, 2 and 3), and Woodland v Essex County Council. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:36 am
Activities by teachers in the course of collective bargaining are not protected activities within the meaning of the Taylor Law when such activities place students at riskLucia v Board of Educ. of the E. [read post]
3 Jun 2017, 6:43 pm by Patricia Salkin
AllEnergy Corporation and  AllEnergy Silica v Trempealeau County Environment and Land Use Committee, 2017 WL 2349200 (WI 5/31/2017)Filed under: Fracking, Special Use/Exception [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:46 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Woodlands Operating Co., 292 S.W.3d 660, 666 (Tex. 2009); Mustang Pipeline Co., 134 S.W.3d at 201; Green Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:21 am by Abbott & Kindermann
SeeApproval of Oak Woodland Management Plan and Mitigation Fee Program Based on a Negative Declaration is Overturned by Third District Appellate Court. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
These rules flow out of two primary sources, the law on liquidated damages and the appellate case of Orozco v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:18 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See, e.g., Woodland Trust v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
In SEC v Capital Gains Research Bureau the US Supreme Court said a pump and dump scheme by an investment adviser violated its fiduciary duty. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 2:29 pm by Chuck Becker
In September of 2009, the federal district court for the Eastern District of California issued a ruling in Adobe Lumber, Inc. v. [read post]