Search for: "BURKS v. STATE"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,035
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2013, 3:50 am
Accordingly, Solum and Chiang challenge the effectiveness of the solutions proposed by previous studies, which focused upon the tools to be used for interpretation (which suggested looking to unbiased third-party sources such as dictionaries and encyclopaedias, to the patentee’s own usage in the patent specification, or to expert testimony), and reject the idea that claim text be innately defective (see Burk and Lemley here). [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 6:13 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Bentley v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:09 am
Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
” One such “provocat[ion],” at least according to China, came when the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Benfold conducted a freedom of navigation operation (FONOP) in the vicinity of the disputed Paracel Islands (Mandarin: Xisha Qundao; Vietnamese: Quần đảo Hoàng Sa) in the South China Sea on Jan. 20. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
” One such “provocat[ion],” at least according to China, came when the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Benfold conducted a freedom of navigation operation (FONOP) in the vicinity of the disputed Paracel Islands (Mandarin: Xisha Qundao; Vietnamese: Quần đảo Hoàng Sa) in the South China Sea on Jan. 20. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
The reasoning of these decisions varied at times, but the theme was consistent and widely understood that "a series of steps for conducting business could not be patented" (at pages 26-27 of his decision Justice Stevens cited several such cases including US Credit Sys Co v American Credit Indem Co (1893), Hotel Security Checking Co v Lorraine Co (1908), Loew's Drive-In Theatres, Inc v Park-In Theatres, Inc (1949)). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:48 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Hunter v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:31 pm
United States, 72 Fed. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:05 am
Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:58 am
One member pointed out that this is a revival of the old 1980s Skadden v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 4:00 pm
" Farrell v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:02 pm
The lead opinion carried the signatures of only two Justices, Justices Kilbride and Burke. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:28 pm
” (See, e.g., Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
Jonathan Masur – "The outcome in Oil States provides a possibly counter-intuitive answer as to whether panel stacking by the PTO director will remain permissible. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:55 am
Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm
Rhodes & Cassandra Burke Robertson: A New State Registration Act: Legislating A Longer Arm for Personal Jurisdiction, 57 Harv. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
City of Boca Ratonand Burlington Industries v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 2:41 pm
And then COVID-19 came to the States, schools began to shut down, offices began to close, and even our children began to learn what the word “Zoom” meant. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
