Search for: "Baker v. Baker" Results 981 - 1000 of 4,429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2007, 12:02 am
In this action, California seeks damages against several major automakers on the grounds of state and federal public nuisance law.The District Court dismissed on the ground that the case raises non-justiciable political questions, with a particular focus on the third factor of Baker v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:01 am by Vishnu Kannan
Bobby Chesney discussed Justice Stephen Breyer’s analysis of the denial of cert in Al-Alwi v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:20 pm by Michel-Adrien Sheppard
” You may have also caught the article Santa Claus in court: From bingo prizes to custody hearings by Nathan Baker earlier this week in The Lawyer’s Daily. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 2:39 am
 This week, it's a baker's dozen, plus one. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
This collection shows how important it is, despite the constant temptation to compression, not to lose sight of the contexts and nuances which qualify and illuminate so many leading authorities.TOC after the jump. 1 R v Pease (1832) MARK WILDE AND CHARLOTTE SMITH2 Burón v Denman (1848) CHARLES MITCHELL AND LESLIE TURANO3 George v Skivington (1869) DAVID IBBETSON4 Daniel v Metropolitan Railway Company (1871) MICHAEL LOBBAN5 Woodley v Metropolitan… [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm by Rich Vetstein
This practice has been vigorously opposed by REBA which filed a successful lawsuit effectively barring the practice in REBA v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Editor’s Note: The following is a post that I contributed to the Baker Hostetler Class Action Lawsuit Defense Blog. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care, Leah Litman considers how the issues in Gundy v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 11:18 am by Curt Cutting
Baker, 554 U.S. 471 (2008).California courts have already grappled with the first question as a matter of state law. [read post]