Search for: "Bridges v. United States" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,060
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2016, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court, in deciding this case, is not likely to reopen its 1872 precedent in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am by Camilla Hrdy
In the course of this work I encountered Section 1905 in the following way.There was, and still is, a federal law on the books enacted in 2007 called the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act that mandates that important information from the majority of significant clinical trials run in the United States be published on the National Institute of Health (NIH) website. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 differed from the device of I2 […] in that it included the (additional and final) feature dealing with the relationship between the light output L and the signal level V. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
DPPA was initially introduced in the House of Representatives on March 30, 2006 and would amend title 17, section 2 of the United States Code, by expanding the term, "design," to include "fashion design" and affording protection to fashion designs.[9] An identical bill was also introduced in the Senate on August 2, 2007.[10] DPPA would essentially extend protection to the appearance as a whole of an article of apparel, including its ornamentation, with apparel… [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In both the United States and Canada, they found people would forgo money in order to avoid hearing about the political thinking of those they disagree with. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am by centerforartlaw
For example, the United States’s general copyright duration is 70 years after the death of the author, and Mexico’s duration is 100 years after the death of the author. [read post]
26 May 2016, 12:25 pm by Victoria Kwan
Two days later, he spoke at a panel discussion for the Brooklyn Bar Association, where he defended the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And yet I took the job.And swore the oath set forth in 28 USC § 453.Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the… [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:48 am by Zack Bluestone
Nevin, the SJA explained that KSM’s stated reason for not attending was that the guard force had not told him that there was a hearing scheduled for Sunday. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:27 pm
The Su ­preme Court's decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 2:38 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
It also noted that the sea level along the West Coast of the United States is projected to rise 4 to 8 inches by 2050, and possibly more than 3.5 feet by 2100. [read post]