Search for: "Close v. U. S"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2023, 4:40 am
” Third, the Court held: [T]he court cannot determine as a matter of law that it was improper for Kessler to counterclaim against Pascal individually, particularly because JJS is a closely held corporation and its interests are tied closely with Pascal’s own interests (see Conant v Schnall, 33 AD2d 326, 328 [3d Dept 1970] [citing general rule that a ‘shareholder bringing a derivative action is not subject to counterclaims against him… [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:01 pm
“The Court may consider the company’s past performance as well as future events that are ‘known or susceptible of proof’ as of the valuation date” (Ferolito v AriZona Beverages USA LLC, 2014 NY Slip Op 32830(U) [Sup Ct, Nassau County Oct. 14, 2014]). [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:29 am
” Court Denies Dismissal of Daughter’s Claim to Enforce Father’s Alleged Oral Promise in 1999 to Transfer 50% LLC Membership Interest Renk v Renk, 2020 NY Slip Op 31526(U) [Sup Ct NY County May 21, 2020], involves a dispute pitting a daughter against her father and siblings over her alleged 50% ownership of a successful family-operated jewelry business known as Sequin, LLC. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 4:54 am
These two state’s non-unanimous verdict requirements were recently "denied review" by the U. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 8:37 pm
U. of Illinois Found., 402 U.S. 313, 332–33 (1971). [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 1:30 pm
(She said it with the extra 'u' so that's how I'm writing it.) [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:05 pm
"We have considered MPEP(v) and note that all address the issue of enablement of a written description under 35 USC, first paragraph. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
"We have considered MPEP(v) and note that all address the issue of enablement of a written description under 35 USC, first paragraph. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 4:23 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:00 am
The High Court’s decision in Serdar Mohammed v Secretary of State for Defence (2015) further stretched the ECHR’s reach to Afghanistan. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:31 am
The personal representative must not comingle the estate's funds with his or her own funds, and needs to be fully accountable for all of the decedent's property during the administration of the estate. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:54 am
.' Hernandez v Marquez 2012 NY Slip Op 31112(U) April 20, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 103531/11 Judge: Joan A. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:33 pm
United States, 588 U. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
The Obligation of Care Largely Mirrors FINRA’s “Suitability” Rule Reg BI’s obligation of care closely resembles the suitability standard of FINRA Rule 2111. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:57 am
S. 42, 44– 45 (1950); Sonzinsky v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
In Oppenheimer v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:57 am
Google: Judge Alsup’s new decision in Sonos v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
S. 555 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:04 am
” Ellen Gilmer at Bloomberg Environment takes a close look at U,S. [read post]
