Search for: "Cooper v. United States" Results 981 - 1000 of 3,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2009, 9:13 am
In any event, the consent judgment includes $600k payment to Square Enix, so yes, the infringers WILL think twice about doing this again.In another press release dated Feb. 12, 2008, the lawsuit was noted to have been filed and was "a result of cooperation with the United States Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Patrol, whose agents seized a crate of counterfeit replica swords. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 2:40 pm by Russell Knight
Getting into the United States is relatively easy. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
As Election Day turns into Election Night, do you worry about a similar scenario playing out in the United States? [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 1:12 am
Highlights from EAB's Decision EPA Region 8 issued a PSD permit to Deseret Power Electric Cooperative (Deseret) for a proposed waste-coal-fired electric generating unit planned at the existing Bonanza Power Plant in Utah. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:51 pm
., the Court states that “[t]here is neither a bar nor a presumption against appointing foreign entities to serve as lead plaintiff, particularly where, as here, the defendant is a U.S. company and the foreign entities bought their shares in the United States”, in effect dismissing the res judicata concerns raised by other movants in relation to the appointment of a foreign entity as lead plaintiff. [read post]
25 May 2007, 10:00 am
By way of example, "public housing" and cooperative apartments are excluded from its ambit. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 1:21 am
  The fact pattern you describe is very similar to a case decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in late 2005, Rowe v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
The defendants are a married couple who resided in a home owned by Joan Frank at 3 Cooper Lane in Westport. [read post]
29 May 2010, 7:48 pm
" Ouch.....The Court did recognize that professional sports organizations have to necessarily unite and cooperate for advancement of the league, but cooperation is not justification when that cooperation is so concerted as to fall foul of section 1 (page 14 of the decision).In closing the Court recognized that while the NFL teams share an interest in making the league successful and profitable in areas like scheduling, but that it does not justify… [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:43 am by Zietlow, Rebecca E.
"  How could Ashley have made this statement four years after the United States Supreme Court declared a constitutional right to own slaves in the infamous decision of Dred Scott v. [read post]