Search for: "In Re Stanley"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2009, 5:35 am
Judge Stanley Chesler, declining to suppress the results of the search despite the erroneous information upon which the search warrant application was based, apparently relied upon this language in Herring: “To trigger the exclusionary rule,” [Chief Justice Roberts] wrote, “police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningfully deter it, and sufficiently culpable that such deterrence is worth the price paid by the justice system. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 3:15 pm
It’s like we’re on autopilot when it comes to food.The autopilot is constantly steering us in bad directions. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 8:27 am
Dave: I don’t know what you’re talking about, HAL. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:46 pm
Morgan Stanley Capital Group (In re Energy Future Holdings Corp.), No. 18-1957, 2019 WL 2535700 (3d Cir. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:10 am
And if the worst happens, the biggest bankers and investors now know they’ll be bailed out by taxpayers because they’re too big to fail. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:40 am
The judges (Lords Justices Maurice Kay, Stanley Brunton -- who gave the leading judgment -- and Lewison) were not persuaded that the Bolkiah rule was of broad application beyond solicitors. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:00 am
Morgan, and Morgan Stanley also recently announced that their financing for new plants would be contingent on the utilities’ plans to control greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]
1 May 2009, 1:26 pm
They’ll argue that their contracts can’t be easily rejected by a bankruptcy judge because they’re protected by state franchise laws. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
Will Emerson says, “If you really wanna do this with your life, you have to believe you’re necessary. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 8:51 am
Fed Vice Chair Stanley Fischer’s four-year term lasts until January 2020. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
RE Broker 2 John Brancato U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
Yeah, like you’re not.) [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 7:16 am
Duties include: (1) Surveying the wild places you’re fighting for; (2) Navigating through tamarisk and government-agency offices, from Ogden to Kanab, and Flagstaff to Moab; (3) Learning from Native leaders; (4) Studying the plans and projects that may harm the places we advocate for; and (5) Writing comments on those proposals, to represent the Grand Canyon Trust in administrative proceedings, to drop pithy quotes for the papers, and to otherwise press our case for the Colorado… [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:01 pm
In re: People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 12:02 pm
“You’re never possibly going to be paying back all the restitution that’s going to be ordered,” said Saris. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:09 pm
In its October 2014 decision in In re NVIDIA Corp. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
We're not going to wade very far into the debate over the SCOTUS decision that mostly upheld the Affordable Healthcare Act. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
In re Cortright, 165 F.3d 1353 (1999). [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 2:21 pm
Stanley, 71 M.J. 60 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (petition for cert. filed), he then assumes that Mansur could have escalated the level of force and conclude[s] that a naked and unarmed individual in the desert does not escalate the level of force when he throws a piece of concrete at an initial aggressor in full battle attire, armed with a loaded pistol, and lunges for the pistol. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Diamant, Stanley B. [read post]
