Search for: "Michael Dorf"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2011, 5:30 pm
Larry Tribe (Harvard), one of the nation’s leading liberal constitutional law scholars, passed along this item (also posted at Dorf on Law), and I thought our readers would find it interesting:I. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:02 am
Dude, that is so not change we can believe in.Posted by Mike Dorf [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:25 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf responds to a recent essay by Senator Ted Cruz on Bond v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:07 am
Luntley, Michael. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 7:16 am
” And writing at Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf suggests that Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am
In a series of posts (here, here, and here) at Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf discusses the likelihood that the Court will stay a federal district judge’s decision invalidating Utah’s ban on same-sex marriages, as well as the possible timing of the Court’s actions and the impact that a ruling reversing the lower court could have on the same-sex marriages already performed in that state. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:52 am
In a post at Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf discusses an important question left open by the Court’s order – whether the nine-hundred-plus same-sex marriages that took place in Utah in late December and early January are valid – while at his Election Law Blog Rick Hasen predicts that “we should expect within the next year or two for the Supreme Court to issue a ruling on the merits of constitutionality of a ban on same sex marriage. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
(Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux, Laura Bronner & Anna Wiederkehr, FiveThirtyEight) How Amy Coney Barrett Could Affect the Future of the Affordable Care Act (Isaac Chotiner, The New Yorker) Barrett Indicates Her Comfort With High Court’s Recent Religion Decisions (Mark Walsh, Education Week) Amy Coney Barrett on Guns (Jake Charles, Duke Center for Firearms Law) Judge Barrett Herself Explained Why “The Law As Written” Often Merges With Her “Preferences” (Michael… [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 1:40 pm
Michael Dorf (Columbia Law School) has a new essay posted on the Harvard Law and Policy website, see here, which asks the following question: "Does Federal Executive Branch Experience Explain Why Some Republican Justices 'Evolve' and Others Don't? [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 9:23 pm
Stephen Breyer was my prime example.Posted by Mike Dorf [read post]
30 May 2023, 6:04 am
" Motivated in part by some friendly disagreement with Michael Dorf, the President's comments seem like a good occasion for me to revisit the absence of a 14th Amendment authority to exceed the limit and respond to a few of Dorf's points. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
Dorf {N.B. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:00 am
Even so, it is instructive.What would an honest attempt to respond to the Buchanan-Dorf run of arguments look like? [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 5:16 am
(On the other hand, as Michael Dorf pointed out earlier this week, Specter's move could also make it more difficult to win confirmation of Obama's judicial nominations.)Fair enough. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:16 am
And Michael Dorf has two posts on the decision: at Verdict, he compares the Roberts Court’s view of politics with that of the fictional Frank Underwood in the TV series House of Cards, while at Dorf on Law, he disputes the argument that members of Congress “should be the last people to help decide who should govern. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:19 am
The National Constitution Center also hosted a podcast on the case, featuring Eugene Kontorovich, Michael Ramsey, and Jeffrey Rosen. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am
by Michael C. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Buchanan & Michael C. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 7:30 am
” At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf has a follow-up to his Findlaw piece on Senator Specter’s proposal to require the Court to allow cameras at oral arguments (which Adam covered in yesterday’s round-up). [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:43 am
Dorf:(1) there is a difference between support for same-sex marriage as a policy matter and as a constitutional matter; (2) premature constitutionalization of a right that cannot yet be said to be deeply rooted in the nation’s history and traditions risks undermining long-term support for the right because defeat of the anti-same-sex-marriage position in the democratic process would be more acceptable; and (3) the majority’s logic opens the door to claims such as a right to… [read post]
