Search for: "POWELL v. STATE" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,604
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2012, 7:14 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is also supported by Texas case law in the 1987, Texas Supreme Court case, Crawford v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:08 am by Christopher Sagers
  If the Court takes the case, it would likely clarify the “foreseeability” test for clear articulation first formulated by Justice Powell—something of a foe of antitrust enforcement—in Town of Hallie v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:53 am by Susan Brenner
Code § 1030(c)(2)(B)(ii), which states that the punishment for an offense under 18 U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:18 am by Steve Hall
And: Arbitrariness in the imposition of the death penalty is exactly the type of thing the Constitution prohibits, as Justice Lewis Powell, Justice Potter Stewart, and I explained in our joint opinion in Gregg v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Ryan M. Rodenberg
Carlisle, P.A.Serona Elton: Assistant Professor of Music Business & Entertainment Industries, University of MiamiDennis Curran: Senior Vice President & General Counsel, National Football LeagueStephen Starks: Legal Affairs Director, United States Anti-Doping AgencyScott Shapiro: Praver Shapiro Sports Management, FounderMike Santos: Assistant General Manager, Florida PanthersTony Agnone: Owner, Eastern Athletic ServicesJan Paulsson: Professor, University of Miami School of LawYaphett… [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am by George M. Wallace
In the majority opinion by Justice Powell, Mathews v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am by George M. Wallace
In the majority opinion by Justice Powell, Mathews v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am by George M. Wallace
In the majority opinion by Justice Powell, Mathews v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:07 pm by Sam Eichner
On January 10, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
A certain kind of original-intent theory was self-defeating, if Powell's historical analysis was correct. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Because lower courts are bound to follow this Court’s decisions until they are withdrawn or modified, however, Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]