Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 981 - 1000
of 52,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2016, 2:21 am
In a case brought by Rights of Women determined in February this year, the Court of Appeal concluded that Regulations made under LASPO requiring victims of domestic violence to satisfy onerous evidential requirements directed at establishing the necessary victimhood as a condition of a grant of legal aid, were contrary to the purpose of LASPO and unlawful (R (Rights of Women) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] EWCA Civ 91). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:56 am
Especially if (as is often the case) the reversal is thought by those reversed to be both erroneous and overly dismissive. [read post]
26 May 2023, 5:50 am
Her reasoning on this aspect of the case is considered in more detail below. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
This was said to have caused harm, particularly to children and young people. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 12:40 pm
Related Cases: Smith v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:10 pm
In the case of Lachaux v Independent Print ([2015] EWHC 2242 (QB)) Warby J gave judgement on preliminary issues including in relation to “serious harm” in a number of libel actions brought against three newspapers and the Huffington Post. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 1:24 pm
Four DePaul Law faculty members have signed a friend of the court brief in an appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court in the case of People of the State of illinois v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
Considerations of the possible impact of the Act on cases such as Dabrowski v Greeuw may reinforce those views. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 1:00 pm
As well as how much rides on that determination.A depressing case on every level. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 3:50 pm
I'm not at all confident that this judgment will be a favorable one.At the same time, defenders of our contemporary practices will point to cases like this one as why we did what we did.Anyway, a distressing case. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 8:23 am
Many death penalty cases are relatively straightforward, at least in terms of motivation or why and how things went down as they did. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 12:38 pm
Which is fairly rare.But, then again, this is a pretty rare case. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:13 am
v=_ymbv-Z5KRk The post AbleGamers: breaking down barriers for people with disabilities appeared first on Michigan Birth Injury & HIE Attorneys. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:51 am
The case of Carmer v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:38 pm
On the merits, I initially agreed with the majority opinion by Justice Woods in this case. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am
First, in a 1984 Supreme Court case called Chevron v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:25 am
The trial in the case of Johnny Depp v News Group Newspapers in the High Court in London before Nicol J continued on Friday 15 July (Day 9), Monday 20 July (Day 10) and Tuesday 21 July (Day 11). [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 6:24 am
On Tuesday, August 6, 2019, in Palin v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
I'd have been stunned -- truly, remarkably stunned -- had the California Supreme Court done anything other than what it did in this incredibly high-profile case. [read post]
