Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 981 - 1000 of 4,019
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2015, 10:50 am
The contract states that the workers are solely the employees of the SC. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:25 am
 https://justicebuilding.blogspot.com/2019/03/state-v-officer-aledda.htmlJudge Alan Fine presided over both trials. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
” (Complaint, paragraph 43)Some may find that hard to swallow.# # #SOURCESINGO v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:38 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States  (Federal Fiduciary Duty)Northern Natural Gas Company v. 80 Acres of Land in Thurston County  (Rights-of-Way)Wilhite v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:32 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In relation to “the expenditure issue”, entitlement to capital allowances required there to have been real expenditure for the real purpose of acquiring plant or machinery for use in a trade. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| Plant variety in Case C‑242/14 | US Supreme Court on spiderman patent | Hospira v Genentech saga | Are EU policy-makers fighting the right copyright battles? [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 8:13 am
This is what she writes: "Only weeks after the US Supreme Court ruled in favour of Monsanto’s right to control the sale, licensing and planting of second generation (and beyond) soybean seeds bearing its patented Roundup Ready technology (Bowman v Monsanto, reported on in depth here, here and here), Monsanto is at the receiving end of a lawsuit related to its Roundup Ready technology – this time involving wheat. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Vaccinated jurors, a parking monopoly, and plant-based meat.] [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Precipitating the lawsuit, federal law enforcement officials in California had seized and destroyed an individual's cannabis plants, after county officials had concluded that her cultivation of the plants and use of marijuana was lawful under California's medical marijuana law. [read post]