Search for: "United States v. Burns" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2025, 4:07 am by SHG
This damage has already been done, and the United States has burned generations of international good will so that Trump’s bizarre adoration for Putin can blossom. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:27 am by Paul Cassell
  Any voluntary statements made by the suspect shall be admissible in any prosecution thereafter brought by the United States or by the District of Columbia. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 12:54 pm
If we did not ask such questions, we would still burn witches, buy slaves, and deny women the vote. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:58 pm
Johnson), whereas a law that forbids people from destroying their draft cards for (what the Court somewhat disingenuously accepted as) administrative purposes does not violate the First Amendment, even if the particular draft card burner intends to express a message by burning the draft card (as the Court held in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Molly Runkle
Addressing the first accusation, Maynard argued that the Sisters’ prophesying activity was protected by the First Amendment. (11th century Scottish law here looks remarkably similar to that of the 21st century United States.) [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:49 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The opinion was issued on February 22, 2012, by the United States Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 6:57 pm by Amy Howe
In 1970, Stevens was nominated to the United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:13 am by Eugene Volokh
" The First Amendment to the United States Constitution demands that we not treat such speech-based injunctions so lightly. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am by Pace Law School Library
:  the failure of safe drinking waterenforcement in the United States. [read post]