Search for: "United States v. Daniels"
Results 981 - 1000
of 2,374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2012, 1:54 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has good news for Samsung, and Samsung has already shared it with Judge Koh in a late-night filing. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 3:14 pm
Federal Appellate Review post-Rita v United States Sherod Thaxton Book Reviews The Structure of Classical Public Law The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought Duncan Kennedy Barry Cushman Some Realism about Mass Torts Mass Torts in a World of Settlement Richard A. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyCase number: 13-cv-02279 (United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois)Case filed: December 20, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 21, 2014 02/24/2014 05/25/2014 2014-17 SEC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 6:04 am
Following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Atkins v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 10:31 am
Although HDC argued that both United States v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:49 am
Due process and negotiated agreementsCiambriello v Nassau County, CA2, 01-7556 The Ciambriello case involves a situation not uncommon in labor relations: a union filing a grievance on behalf certain members in the negotiating unit that adversely affects other members in the same unit. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:45 am
Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:17 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:28 am
Writing at Washington Monthly, Daniel Luzer discusses Fisher v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 5:01 am
In The Florida Star v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:18 pm
HART; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-04-00436-CV, 240 SW3d 16, 07-05-07)08-0077 DANIEL K. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
United States, the court held 8-1 that Congress is required to reimburse health insurance companies for losses created by the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:36 pm
It is not a decision by either the SJC or the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:40 pm
” But State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2018, 11:51 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 6:01 pm
Mistaken identifications are the leading cause of wrongful convictions in the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
United States, in which the Court held that a Pennsylvania woman who attempted to poison her husband’s mistress could not be prosecuted in federal court. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
But in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
United States. [read post]
