Search for: "United States v. Judge"
Results 981 - 1000
of 31,487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2017, 11:54 am
Armed with Article VI, one of the treaty parties, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, filed suit, asking the federal court to declare the United States in breach of its treaty obligations and to order the United States to engage in good-faith negotiations. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:16 pm
A Chicago federal judge entered a Chicago medical malpractice verdict in the amount of $8,8330,182 against the United States following a bench trial. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:15 am
Late last week, a federal jury came back with their verdict in the case of the United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:48 pm
This post concerns an opinion is from judges who sit in the District Court of Appeals of Florida –Second District: Leach v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:50 pm
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency, 10 Civ. 3488 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
The dissent is the longer portion of the decision in INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am
This month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois rejected Fifield’s bright line test in the case of Bankers Life and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 2:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:43 am
Colvin, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, June 29, 2016 More Blog Entries: Stacy v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:17 am
As previously reported here, Senior United States District Judge Roger Vinson of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida declared the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”) void in a summary judgment decision in the case of State of Florida, et al. v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 10:14 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:14 pm
The Court held that where the trial judge determined that a prosecutor failed to present sufficient evidence to convict the defendant, the double-jeopardy clauses of the United States Constitution and the Michigan Constitution prohibit retrial. [read post]
17 Nov 2004, 7:36 am
Cassell in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 7:31 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:14 pm
It must have been a showstopper, because after hearing defense counsel's opening statement and before hearing any evidence, a juror in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 9:06 am
Colvin, August 19, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit More Blog Entries: Mays v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:01 am
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California held an initial case management conference in Continental v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 10:00 pm
In Luckey v. [read post]
