Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 981 - 1000
of 9,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2008, 3:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 8:09 am
Below are some samples of their work: STOPPING THE OBSCENITY MADNESS 50 YEARS AFTER ROTH V. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
The judge wielded a "broad axe" and assessed the loss of profits at £14.45 per unit x 1,755 units i.e. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 9:25 am
The first Monday in October traditionally marks the beginning of the United States Supreme Court's yearly term - and it provides an excellent opportunity to look at the cases the Court will be hearing this year. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
TrueNorth Companies, L.C. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 1:22 am
Swatch, S.A. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:41 am
The following post is by Mark Graber, co-editor with Mark Tushnet and Sanford Levinson of the recently published Oxford Handbook of the United States Constitution. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 4:08 am
Couture v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:45 am
Direct Command --Constitution of the United States Article I, V --Notes and Questions --b. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 7:21 am
" Any person can file suit for a violation of the statute, and the proceeds are split half to the person suing and half to the United States. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:57 am
United States, 536 U.S. 1014 (2002). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
United States, 362 U.S. 402, 402 (1960); see State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:18 am
The Board placed emphasis on the place of the use of the mark in arriving and their decision, stating that there was strong evidence suggesting that Standard Hotels in the United States despite documentation referring to advertisements and promotional campaigns targeting EU customers. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Amazon's trade mark travails in the USThe doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales] is a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 1:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm
”) (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 6:43 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm
At trial, the owner argued that the United States is liable for the allision because of a nautical chart error. [read post]
Case Preview: Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (Case ID: 2021/0201).
21 Feb 2023, 7:35 am
In this post, Rachel Free (Partner), Toby Sears (Partner) and Omri Shirion (Associate) of the CMS Intellectual Property team, preview the UK Supreme Court’s upcoming hearing of Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:12 am
Andrusiek v. [read post]
