Search for: "State v. Law" Results 9981 - 10000 of 155,471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 3:34 am by Walter Olson
Louis [Show-Me Institute] “Conservative groups pushing for a constitutional convention are just six states short of their goal. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
This week’s summaries concern: Administrative Law – Civil Rights – Elections – Bankruptcy – Indians, Inuit and Métis Trinity Western University et al. v. [read post]
The Speaker assured the people of Ghana that the House is live and at work amidst the determination of the suit Afenyo Markins v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The cert. petition was filed in October 2014, with the following statement of the question presented: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred by holding, in direct conflict with the Ninth Circuit, that a reference to state law in an arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act requires the application of state law preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 1:11 am
Morrison, Columbia Law School, has posted The Story of United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:47 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:29 pm by Oyez Project
United States In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:15 pm by Kristina Araya
Mungo in light of the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Davis v. [read post]