Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 9981 - 10000
of 19,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
Justice Manmohan Singh of the Delhi High Court, in Arun Jaitley v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
Marking the retirement of Justice A.P. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
[27] One main factor of consideration is whether or not the foreign manufacturer has assigned United States trademark rights and their registration to the designated exclusive United States importer.[28] United States and international antitrust and free competition policies intersect with trademark law in that the designated United States importer is usually concerned with gray market goods because they are sold for less, undercutting the designated United… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:59 am
Mark A. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:24 am
The ruling marks a significant step forward for access to socio-economic rights for long-term resident third-country nationals living in Member States. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 8:44 am
Hawg Tools, LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 11:19 am
Nevertheless, the trial court awarded summary judgment to the school district, determining that the superintendent failed to prove, as required under the McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 11:56 am
Thereafter, his wife filed an application for accidental death benefits with the New York State and Local Employees Retirement System. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:25 pm
In Oates v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:56 pm
First, we heard closing args in the Fairbairn v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 7:37 am
” Among the items he cited was “the biggest booster since the Apollo-era Saturn V [that] is well on its way to launching a new American journey into deep space. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 6:42 pm
For illustrative purposes, this book considers the key phases of jury trials (opening statements, direct and cross-examination, closing arguments and voir dire) in the light of a particular case: United States of America v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 9:05 am
” Tell me he didn’t put quotation marks around exceptionalism! [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
Increasingly, however, the state is struggling. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Titanic v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:37 pm
This decision surely marks the height of his hubris. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 2:01 pm
The Tenth Circuit relied upon the United States Supreme Court decision of Rucklehaus v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:19 am
L.J. ___ (googlepatents101.pdf) Mark R. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm
One need only reflect on the fact that more than 1,000 qui tam actions for false marking were filed by opportunistic plaintiffs following the 2009 Federal Circuit decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
