Search for: "Davis v. United States" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2024, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
If a state can do that, we see no reason why a state cannot decide to treat ballots in the possession of the United States Postal Service (USPS) or similarly reliable common carriers in like fashion. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:16 am by Raul "Pete" Pedrozo
” Moreover, even though the United States recognizes the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal government of China, the United States maintains cultural, commercial and other unofficial relations with the people of Taiwan. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:51 am by Erin Miller
In response to the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
Yesterday's Opinion by Justice Souter for the United States Supreme Court in the case of Lopez v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
Bd. of Educ., 777 F.2d 1403, 1410 (10th Cir. 1985); Davis v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm by Samuel Bray
Professor Harrison's work was recently highlighted by Professor Amanda Frost at SCOTUSBlog as one side of a debate critical to United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:51 pm
Liaison Counsel is Byrd Davis Furman LLP. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 5:53 am by SHG
As noted in the New York Times’ editorial, Justice Anthony Kennedy seized the opportunity to write a concurring opinion in Davis v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 6:17 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Fall is back, and, in the United States, that means pumpkin-flavored products and (American) football galore. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 5:23 am by Jon May
What is critical is that Judge Cannon crossed way over the line when she refused to follow the decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
Thomas trial, believed to be the first RIAA case to go to trial in the United States.) **10/4/07, 12:44 AM. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
  The decision came on a 7-2 vote in United States v. [read post]