Search for: "In Re AC" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2014, 8:30 pm by Douglas
Esta última reúne as principais decisões dos ministros do STJ que fizeram parte do TSE como ministros efetivos. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Business side: availability of legal tools was directly relevant to getting into these markets—ACS, 4k, over the top TV, streaming TV through authentication—1201 a factor in all those things. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 8:18 am by Randy Barnett
They’re using the church part of our First Amendment to infuse their morals in that community, and the people of that community do not like it. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:41 am by INFORRM
Because the open justice principle has a constitutional basis in Ireland, the Supreme Court has emphasised that this provision has to be given a very narrow compass (In re R [1989] IR 126; Irish Press v Ingersoll [1994] 1 IR 176, [1993] ILRM 747). [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm by David Post
And then there’s the contrast between Madrid’s collection of international superstars plucked from other teams for outrageous amounts of money — Christiano Ronaldo from Manchester United, Kaka from AC Milan, Benzema from Marseille, Xabi Alonso from Liverpool, . . . [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 10:55 am by Giles Peaker
Significantly, Lord Slynn at paragraph 18 of Mohamed  (Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC (2001) UKHL 57 ) re-considered the approach taken to ‘normal residence’ as discussed in R v Barnet London Borough Council, Ex p Nilish Shah (1983) 2 AC 309, 343, upon which Betts was based, and made clear that “the prima facie meaning of normal residence is a place where at the relevant time the person in fact resides…..and it is not appropriate to consider… [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 7:28 am by Douglas Marques
A decisão foi proferida em Ação Cautelar (AC 3764) ajuizada pelo Conselho Federal da Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil (OAB) contra atos do Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ). [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
The arguments Ms Beech argued that the Ropaigealach decision had to be re-examined in light of the Human Rights Act 1998. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am by INFORRM
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:06 am by 1 Crown Office Row
” Jack of Kent blog 16th September -  “Today’s Met Statement“ Case law which may be of some relevance: X v Morgan Grampian [1991] 1 AC 1 – interpretation of “interests of justice” in the Contempt of Court Act 1981 s.10 Secretary of State for defence v Guardian Newspapers [1984] 2 WLR 268 – “national security” in Contempt of Court Act 1981 s.10 Re an Inquiry under the Company Securities (Insider Dealing) Act 1985… [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:15 am by Rob Robinson
Methodology: Everlaw conducted this study with the Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists (ACEDS) to learn more about key trends in eDiscovery innovation. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 3:21 pm
" Wait just a minute: Since when should clients pay the same for the dud as for the ace? [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for repealing the Clean Power Plan and replacing it with the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule, which loosens federal carbon emissions standards. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm by Francisco Macías
If you’re familiar with the histories of chocolate, then you may have heard that it was not always the sweet treat we know today. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 12:33 pm by Ann Pearson
I had a guest on the podcast a while back – Michael Quarteraro, the President of ACEDS, who said you’re not really doing litigation if you’re not doing eDiscovery. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 12:00 am by Ann Pearson
Here’s an example, let’s say you are a litigation paralegal who wants to set a goal next year to get your ACEDS eDiscovery certification. [read post]