Search for: "Law v. State" Results 1001 - 1020 of 157,442
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2023, 4:42 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Marc Spindelman (Ohio State University), Stirrings of a Conservative Christian Rule of Law (in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:29 pm by Kali Borkoski
This morning the Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 2:40 am by Immigration Prof
People struck down the state’s law banning immigrant smuggling, saying that the law was preempted by federal immigration law. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am by MBettman
On July 28, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” The post Government Agencies Are Not People Under AIA in Return Mail Inc v United States Postal Service appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 8:15 pm
The University of Missouri Kansas City School of Law is hosting "Red State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Constitution to abrogate state sovereign immunity against federal copyright claims by passing the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act (CRCA) or if, as the Fourth Circuit held, Congress improperly abrogated state sovereign immunity by passing that law. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:56 am by sally
Pomiechowski v District Court of Legunica, Poland; Lukaszewski v District Court in Torun, Poland; Rozanski v Regional Court 3 Penal Department, Poland; Regina (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20; [2012] WLR (D) 158 “When a notice of appeal against an extradition decision had an irregularity which could be cured by amendment and the circumstances merited that, the court had jurisdiction to permit the amendment and… [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 12:41 pm
S. 61 (1975) (per curiam)United States v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 2:07 am
Gomes v Republic of Trinidad and Tobago; Goodyer v Same House of Lords “An accused who deliberately fled from a jurisdiction where his trial was pending was not generally entitled to rely on the passage of time due to the delay of the extraditing state in bringing him to justice as a bar to his extradition. [read post]