Search for: "London v. State"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 3,590
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2023, 11:19 am
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2023) EWHC 1355 (Admin) Ms UO and her 3 children, aged 11, 5 and 3, were homeless and had applied to LB Redbridge. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
(Both Jan Luba QC for Doherty and Philip Sales QC for the Secretary of State challenged this point and it was not uniformly accepted - see below). [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:01 am
New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 3:44 am
EvidenceProf Blog notes that in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:06 pm
They searched under the authority of a warrant which turned out to be unlawful - see Redknapp v City of London Police Unfortunately, the Redknapp case suggests that the warrant was granted far too readily by the court which surely ought to be a rather more robust "guardian of the gates" in these matters. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm
The Court of Appeal considered affordability and the proper approach to it in Farah v London Borough of Hillingdon [2014] EWCA Civ 359. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
Imam, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Croydon (2023) UKSC 45 Full transparency – I acted for Crisis on an intervention in this case. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 11:37 am
V.) [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:53 am
That was the case in the coverage action between football helmet manufacturer Riddell and its liability insurers, which is pending in California state court, where certain London Market Insurers tried to require the production of extensive discovery before that substantially identical production took place in the underlying product liability action. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case, Yemshaw v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:01 am
Tropigas de Puerto Rico v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
New London. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 11:29 am
ZRR, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Bexley (2024) EWHC 2073 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Bexley’s contention that temporary accommodation offered to ZRR under s.190 Housing Act 1996 was suitable and its duty was discharged when ZRR refused that accommodation. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:38 am
Background The appellant – KBR, Inc – was a company incorporated in the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
London Borough of Southwark & Anor v Transport for London, heard 24-25 Oct 2018. [read post]
Do Louisiana Cases Against Lloyds Have to Go to Arbitration if the Policy Has an Arbitration Clause?
4 Oct 2023, 5:59 am
—Ellen DeGeneres 1Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:52 am
City of New London renewed both public and judicial interest in the contours of the public use requirement of the Fifth Amendment and its counterparts in state constitutions. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 3:50 pm
It was for good reason that the high court ruling in Kelo v. [read post]
