Search for: "People v. House" Results 1001 - 1020 of 11,351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2018, 10:37 pm by Anthony Gaughan
It is also noteworthy that he joined the Court in 1988, exactly 30 years ago, the kind of round number people often like for bringing careers to a close. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 12:02 am
Groceries, housing, utilities, transportation, and even healthcare are all more expensive in NYC than in Boston. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am by MBettman
Key Precedent Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution (The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.) [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 2:59 pm by David Feldman
More on the new JOBS Act passed yesterday by the US House. 1. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:07 pm
There are a couple of articles in the latest Journal of Housing Law (Vol 11, issue 1 2008) on Malcolm v London Borough of Lewisham and the effect of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 on possession orders. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:16 pm by WIMS
      In April 2007, the Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
It's not like an "oath" is really going to change people's behavior, or "screen out" bad people. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:41 pm
Dennis Quaid testified yesterday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform considering the reversal of the Riegel v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:41 pm
Dennis Quaid testified yesterday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform considering the reversal of the Riegel v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:00 am by Glenn Cohen
My main interest in the case is how it will compare to Abigail Alliance v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm by Ryan Scoville
This case drew a lot of attention from people who care about U.S. foreign relations law because Bond’s second argument asked the Court to overrule Missouri v. [read post]