Search for: "People v. Short"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 8,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am
I have written elsewhere about how to make sense of the “racial v. political” dichotomy that that seems to trouble many people about Indian law. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
It’s time for people to understand that “holding the line on taxes” is going to cost them, and this country, dearly. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 7:04 am
Goel and U.S. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm
See, e.g., Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm , 480 Mich 75, 91 n 13 (2008); Al-Shimmari v Detroit Med Ctr, 477 Mich 280, 297 n 10; 731 NW2d 29 (2007); Neal v Wilkes, 470 Mich 661, 667 n 8; 685 NW2d 648 (2004); People v Hickman, 470 Mich 602, 610 n 6; 684 NW2d 267 (2004); Mack v Detroit, 467 Mich 186, 203 n 19; 649 NW2d 47 (2002). [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:37 am
Most people cannot do anything about it, except for judges. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:37 am
Most people cannot do anything about it, except for judges. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 12:37 pm
Other courts that have recognized the dangers of actively operating methamphetamine laboratories have stopped short of adopting a per se rule. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am
The trust is publicum juris, that is, for the whole People of the State (citing People v Grant, 306 NY 258; City of New York v Rice, 198 NY 124). [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am
The trust is publicum juris, that is, for the whole People of the State (citing People v Grant, 306 NY 258; City of New York v Rice, 198 NY 124). [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Dissolution refers power back to the people by giving them a chance to elect new representations, whereas after prorogation the same MPs reconvene. 1210: Lord Garnier QC refers to witness statement of Sir John Major KG CH as to the purpose of prorogation, why it is exercised and what considerations might impact on its use. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
Having ordered a retrial, the CA stopped short of determining whether Ms Kogan’s contributions were enough to warrant joint authorship, but the message seems reasonably clear. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 3:10 pm
People v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 11:42 am
Finally, Part V asks whether cop shows can do better. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 6:28 pm
Please refer to the recent decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in SBI v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:24 pm
"For whatever reason, they could not bring themselves to do what they were about to tell the American people that they had to do" seven years later in the landmark Brown v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 11:19 am
We are expecting over 800 high school students from 34 counties to present their case (People v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 12:35 am
Flanking them were James Sherk, also of the Heritage Foundation, and William Messenger, the attorney from the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation who argued Harris v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
An edited excerpt from that exclusive interview follows:“V: [D]id you struggle with a specific song .. or a scene while shooting [the short]….? [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 8:08 am
"■ I can see no possible way for this to go wrong:California Senate Bill would outlaw short-term health insurance 🤔#SB910 #California #STM #HealthInsurancehttps://t.co/I9coXHu8yX— David Fluker (@FlukerDavid) April 3, 2018■ BONUS ITEM: Co-blogger Bob V tips us to this interesting story on why folks choose - often at their own peril - not to buy whole life plans. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 3:54 pm
Because it'll soon be in the California Supreme Court and no longer controlling precedent.The question at issue is whether People v. [read post]
