Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 3,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2008, 7:21 am
An unfortunate part of my job is to have a court officer seize assets from people who refuse to pay the judgments that are placed with us for collection. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 7:21 am
An unfortunate part of my job is to have a court officer seize assets from people who refuse to pay the judgments that are placed with us for collection. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:58 am
In a series of cases culminating with Press-Enterprise v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 10:32 am
Recently, in a non-reported decision in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania called M.R.D. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 6:27 am
Last November, Superior Court Judge Robert C. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
This heightened standard reflects the constitutionally protected `”interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:30 am
Since then, a succession of Maricopa County Superior Court judges have served as watchdog for people with mental-health issues, monitoring state funding and hearing arguments about the adequacy of care, from housing to employment to skills training. [read post]
4 May 2022, 6:58 pm
If Roe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:25 am
Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102 (1987). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:25 am
Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102 (1987). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 6:45 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:10 am
The bill of rights protects people from the government but does not oblige the government to furnish protection against private violence. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:33 am
”In Gao v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm
In a case from Forsyth County, Superior Court Judge John O. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
"The United States Supreme Court has applied a two-part test to determine whether there was a right of access under the First Amendment [see Press-Enterprise Co. v Superior Ct. of Cal., County of Riverside, 478 US 1, 8-10], and the [New York State] Court of Appeals has used that test to determine whether there is a right of access to a professional disciplinary hearing;4. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 4:21 pm
Daniel RR v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
As Constance Backhouse recounts, when Madam Justice L’Heureux-Dubé was appointed to the Superior Court of Quebec in 1973, she objected to being addressed as Monsieur le juge, the term most often blurted out by the lawyers who appeared in her courtroom. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Today’s case is Dimieri v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 10:59 am
Superior Court (1996) 14 Cal.4th 294, 313-314, 58 Cal.Rptr.2d 855, 926 P.2d 1042 [discussing Hale].) [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:29 am
Case Citation: Brooks v. [read post]
