Search for: "Richard A. Epstein" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2015, 3:32 am by Walter Olson
Federal Circuit court of appeals says government can’t deny trademark as “disparaging” just because it frowns on its expressive content, implications are favorable for Washington Redskins in their legal case [Eugene Volokh, Paul Alan Levy, In Re Simon Shiao Tam opinion, case won by past Overlawyered guestblogger Ron Coleman] Mentally ill man walks into San Diego county recorder’s office, submits properly filled-out deed transferring major sports stadium to his name,… [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:59 pm by Goldstein & Stamm, P.A.
by Leonard Stamm and Andy Alpert; Don’t Let Your Military Client Go Down with the Ship by John Hunsucker and John Webb; Picking the Winning Jury by John Hunsucker and John Webb, Mimi Coffey and Ryan Russman, and Paul Burglin and Lynn Gorelick; Preparing for Plan B, Sentencing in Serious Cases, taught by Mike Hawkins and George Flowers; Follicles, IIDs, ETG and SCRAM: The Hairs, Airs and Other Snares of DUI, taught by Doug Murphy and Richard Middlebrook; Just Say NO… [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 11:39 am by Walter Olson
Whitehouse helped orchestrate: Richard Epstein, George Will, Ronald Rotunda. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 9:44 am by David Bernstein
"] Richard Epstein, writing for the Claremont Review of Books (paywall), notes Classified's "basic and incontrovertible point is that the standard five-fold classification of white, black, Hispanic, Asian, or American Indians (Native Americans) is utterly useless for deciding who should get preferences in education, business, or anywhere else given a large, heterogeneous population that must be sorted into distinct, but internally disjointed groups. [read post]
14 Dec 2024, 6:38 pm by Steven Calabresi
Bork and Justice Antonin Scalia, would be thrilled with this appointment, as will be Professor Richard Epstein who also helped to launch the Federalist Society in 1982. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 7:29 am by Josh Blackman
The initial slate includes essays by co-blogger Jon Adler, Richard Epstein, and others. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 9:20 am by Sandy Levinson
 But where issues are truly important, precedential "reasoning" has relatively little to be said for it  If I shared Randy Barnett's, Richard Epstein's, or Clarence Thomas's views of constitutional meaning and, more importantly, what constituted the most desirable kind of polity, then I would have no particular commitment to maintaining New Deal precedents in all of their glory. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:46 am by Florian Mueller
That point is also driven home by four U.S. law professors in their submission (PDF on Scribd): Kristen Osenga (University of Richmond), Adam Mossoff (George Mason University), Richard Epstein (New York University), and Jonathan Barnett (University of Southern California).That kind of support may indeed help Ericsson further down the road. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am by Jon Hyman
A recent study published in the Minnesota Law Review [pdf] by Judge Richard Posner of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, University of Chicago economist William Landes, and University of Southern California law professor Lee Epstein (h/t ABA Journal) makes the same argument, albeit in painstaking law-review detail. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:59 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Then-judge Thomas was excoriated by then-Senator Joe Biden for having said nice things about Richard Epstein — as Biden brandished a copy of Takings — how could Lithwick think Epstein would be a “legitimate” candidate for the Court? [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigning to Oversee Elections, While Denying the Last One Yahoo News – Jennifer Medina, Nick Corasaniti, and Reid Epstein (New York Times) | Published: 1/30/2022 Nearly two dozen Republicans who have publicly questioned or disputed the results of the 2020 election are running for secretary of state across the country, in some cases after being directly encouraged by allies of former President Trump. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:27 am by David G. Badertscher
Richard Bistrong, formerly of Armor Holdings, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other statutes. [read post]
25 Apr 2006, 10:50 pm by Dru Stevenson
So, I think Cass Sunstein is right, that the Supreme Court should not do anything like trying to catapult the entire nation back to 1934 (which some activist judges want), because I think the whole point of the Constitution was to create as inefficient a government as possible, while still allowing for some progress, flexibility, and change.Just for fun, I am also reading Richard Epstein's apparent retort to Sunstein's book (Epstein also teaches at the University… [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 11:06 am
  But no one would accuse Richard Epstein of being a narrow doctrinal specialist. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:34 pm by Seth Borden
Professor Richard Epstein believes that the Constitution provides no basis for intra-session recess appointments as have been made increasingly by the last several Presidents of both parties: One major design feature of separation of powers and checks and balances both is to curb excessive strategic behavior. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 12:47 pm by Fredrick Vars
King James Gronquist James Noble James Trimble Janet Ainsworth Janet Dolgin Janet Moore Jed Gross Jeff Bellin Jeff Kirchmeier Jennifer Gundlach Jenny Roberts Jill Paperno Joe Lee Joe Miller John Blume John Lane John Steele John Stinneford John Strait Jon Stage Jonah Gelbach Jonathan Rapping Jonathan Witmer-Rich Joseph Leahy Joshua Dressler Jules Epstein Juli Campagna Juliet Brodie Juliet Stumpf K. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:20 am by Andrew Trask
She argues that: the Supreme Court and some scholars, including Professor Richard Epstein, have justified the new standard on the basis of the costs in Twombly, an “oddball” case—with massive costs and significant asymmetry of costs—and have not shown that the new standard should apply transsubstantively to cases that do not have such costs, including typical employment discrimination cases. [read post]