Search for: "Shorts v. Superior Court"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2022, 7:28 am
” Reiss v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:06 am
Nearly two decades later, Marshall used the same tactic to confirm the superiority of federal constitutional review over that of the state courts in Cohens v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:37 pm
Over his relatively short tenure on the Court, Rutledge seemed quickly to regret his early deference to a powerful President Roosevelt during World War II. [read post]
11 May 2018, 8:12 am
On May 7, 2018, Superior Court Judge Netti C. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 12:47 pm
In Reuter v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 12:47 pm
In Reuter v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
In 2010 the Court issued a per curiam opinion (after calling for the record and nine relists) summarily vacating a Georgia Superior Court decision for misapplying the second (prejudice) prong of Strickland v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 7:36 am
Fenza’s Auto, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 4:34 am
The immediate sentencing issue in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
The Court’s short answer: no dice. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:14 am
Kurtz v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:28 pm
Shortly after the start of the Apple v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm
Malta The Times of Malta reports that architect Ian Zammit was cleared of libel by the Superior Court of Appeal in respect of an article written in 1999. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 7:47 am
Based on a Court of Appeal decision published this week, Young’s Market Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 4:01 am
A physical presence in the form of maintenance of physical premises will be compelling, and a virtual presence that falls short of an actual presence will not suffice. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
Lee v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 7:19 am
Superior Court (Hohnbaum). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The full text of the ruling is set out below.In short, the Court ruled that it "never affirmatively held that a plaintiff need not establish a special duty when stating a negligence cause of action against a municipality for acts occurring when the municipality was engaged in a governmental function. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The full text of the ruling is set out below.In short, the Court ruled that it "never affirmatively held that a plaintiff need not establish a special duty when stating a negligence cause of action against a municipality for acts occurring when the municipality was engaged in a governmental function. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
In R v McKenzie, a 2015 case from the Ontario Superior Court, Campbell J crafted a procedure for determining whether the prosecution had edited too much information from an ITO. [read post]
