Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 1001 - 1020 of 3,565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2008, 6:55 am
  To the Chief Justice - and to the United States, which had supported the employee’s reading of Section 1981 in CBOCS, and the plaintiff’s reading of Title IX in Jackson - that made all the difference. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals sidesteps that argument and finds the statute that defendant was convicted under is constitutional.The case is United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 11:20 am by Cicely Wilson
Jardines, United States Supreme Court (3/26/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawPolice took a drug-sniffing dog to Jardines’ front porch, where the dog gave a positive alert for narcotics. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:10 am by Jamison Koehler
United States: What happens if the evidence introduced by the government at the probation hearing is different than the evidence it presented at trial? [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:03 am
 While the administrative process was pending, American Bird brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii against the FCC under the citizen-suit provision of the ESA... [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court’s decision in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 7:20 pm by Todd Henderson
United States, the boundary of core tribal jurisdiction does not extend “beyond what is necessary to protect tribal self-government. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:48 am by Jeff Foust
The document reiterates many of the points made by SpaceX CEO Elon Musk on Friday when he announced the suit, from concerns about being locked out of competing for EELV contracts to concerns about reliance on United Launch Alliance’s (ULA’s) Atlas V rocket and its Russian-made RD-180 engine. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 9:39 am by Mary Ziegler
The United States, which until now had never brought a challenge to a state abortion restriction, argued that S.B. 8 interferes with its sovereign interest in ensuring that states recognize federal constitutional rights. [read post]