Search for: "United States v. Englander"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2009, 12:35 am
He noted that the decision relied on "spurious historical assumptions," contemporaneous common law from England and the United States, and disregarded settled U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
Thus R. v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Robart in the Western District of Washington is the world's pioneer in FRAND rate-setting decisions, but cases presenting similar challenges are pending in other jurisdictions, including Germany and the United Kingdom. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
If you have been following the saga of the Samsung v Apple patent litigation in England and Wales, which has been stayed so that Samsung can apply to the European Patent Office to have its patents amended (see earlier Katpost here), there's a small but significant sequel, noted on PatLit here. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Others, a Chancery Division, England and Wales, ruling last week from Mr Justice Nugee [don't ask: the Kats haven't come across him either, but he is a Chancery judge], addressed an important preliminary issue. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 9:37 pm
Peter Crowley v United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (unreported, but noted on the Lawtel subscription-only service) is one of those cases that should never be allowed to happen. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 11:18 am
” The Lion Intoxilyzer 8000 Looks Familiar More evidence that the “source code” was developed by Lion Laboratories Limited in England. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
This was - and is - the promise of the Confrontation Clause.For the last several years, the Supreme Court of the United States has reflected upon the meaning of confrontation without much resolution. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
The Courts provided for in subsection A of this section [i.e., all the Oklahoma state courts –EV], when exercising their judicial authority, shall uphold and adhere to the law as provided in the United States Constitution, the Oklahoma Constitution, the United States Code, federal regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, established common law, and the Oklahoma Statutes and rules promulgated pursuant thereto in making judicial decisions. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 460 – 505. [9] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [10] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [11] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [12] Arts Council England, Op cit., p. 14. [13] Crewdson, R. (2006). [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 460 – 505. [9] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [10] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [11] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [12] Arts Council England, Op cit., p. 14. [13] Crewdson, R. (2006). [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 460 – 505. [9] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [10] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [11] Arts Council England, Op. cit. [12] Arts Council England, Op cit., p. 14. [13] Crewdson, R. (2006). [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 12:53 pm
The only question is whether asserting personal jurisdiction would be "consistent with the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 May 2008, 8:20 am
United States, 510 U.S. 163 (1994), under Alan Morrison's tutelage, I learned far more about the Appointments Clause than any reasonable lawyer would want to know. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 9:07 pm
Since joining the academy, Alfred has written regularly in the area of copyright law and served as counsel of record/lead author for an amicus brief to the United States Supreme Court on behalf of 12 copyright scholars in the case of Campbell v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:31 am
Special Report: Freedom of Speech Evolution of our Freedom of ExpressionCharles Davison Our history of freedom of speech is rooted in that of England and the United Kingdom. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:05 am
This in itself puts the European system far ahead of the United States, in which diplomatic assurances are regarded as the province solely of the executive. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 4:57 pm
Federal and State LawsIn the United States, the United States Arbitration Act (Pub.L. 68–401, 43 Stat. 883, enacted February 12, 1925) (FAA) governs international arbitrations. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
United States, a case about tribal fishing rights, the judgment below is affirmed by an equally divided court. [read post]
