Search for: "*money v. Thomas" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,992
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2023, 8:43 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
The Court held (6-3, Stevens writing the opinion, which was joined by Thomas among others), if Congress decides to spend money, the President cannot choose to refuse to spend it unless Congress gives him new authority rejecting the spending. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:10 am
Therefore, on the face of the assertion, Federal would be out of luck because it sought money from New Hampshire for money it gave Mr. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Thomas is next with the opinion in Utah v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 7:21 pm
J. 875 (2007), which is generally about KSR v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:08 pm
(Thomas disagreed and would have invalidated Section 5.) [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm by Adam C. Ragan
” – Justice Clarence Thomas Nearly 3 decades before Zack Morris ascended to the fictional governorship of California, he was America’s best known Preppy—the cool kid with politician hair toting the raddest, most cutting edge, must-have gizmo his Dad’s money could buy: a Motorola DynaTAC 8000X. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Last week, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am by INFORRM
DEFRA v Information Commissioner & Anor [2011] UKUT 39 AAC. [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:00 am
References: The Supreme Court's Review Of A Section 36(b) Fee Suit by Thomas O. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Fellow blogger, tweeter and IP enthusiast Thomas Dubuissontells us about a larger than life dispute between Google and Oracle that is rumbling through the courts in the US. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 5:20 pm
Citing the Supreme Court's 1968 decision in Flast v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 6:19 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In this article, Bryant v Parkland School Division, 2021 ABQB 391, a case in which the plaintiffs sought more money on termination than what their contracts provided, is discussed. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
The challenge to Thomas is based upon three negative assessments: first, of the political advocacy of his wife Virginia, who has been a visible opponent of the new law and who earns a substantial income from that activity; second, of the sources of financial contributions to his wife’s advocacy, including some well-known conservative donors; and, third, of Thomas’s own associations with individuals who have given money to his wife’s causes as… [read post]