Search for: "Commonwealth v. Long"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2020, 12:24 am
In addition to these bases, the foreign court’s jurisdiction will be recognized where there was a real and substantial connection between the matter and the foreign court.[13] The real and substantial connection test entails that a Canadian court can recognize and enforce a foreign judgment that was delivered in circumstances where the defendant was not physically present in the jurisdiction when served with the originating process, as long as a real and substantial connection between… [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 10:06 am
In Westminster City Council v Haw [2002] EWHC 2073 (QB), Mr. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 5:04 am
In a 1986 decision, Mc-Guiggan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
But the gap in the 13th Amendment’s protections has also left a disturbing residue in the jurisprudence of prisoners’ rights.In 1871, the Supreme Court of Virginia made this clear in Ruffin v Commonwealth. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:30 am
Voters All. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:44 am
See Berger v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:20 am
The Director-General stated that, “unexplained wealth does have to be unexplained and, unfortunately… Russians have been investing for a long period of time… you can track back and you can see how they will make a case in court that their wealth is not unexplained. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 5:21 am
Squire Sanders & Dempsey LLPOn August 18, 2010 the US Securities and Exchange Commission issued Release No 33-9135, a cease and desist order (the Order) settling claims against the state of New Jersey as a result of what the SEC determined was inadequate disclosure of the financial condition of New Jersey's pension funds.Health care reform — regulations issued on expanded internal/external claims review process for nongrandfathered group health plansHunton & Williams LLPOn July… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
This is a long, tedious post. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
This is a long, tedious post. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
We’ll leave it to you to check them twice, if you stay awake that long. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm
” Knight v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 4:26 pm
United States (for a CT discussion see State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm
” Baxter v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
It gave McIntyre a life-long interest in the subject in general and a particular fondness for Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.[7] Given this deep affinity between philosophy and law, one might expect to see explicit references to the major philosophers in the decisions written by judges.[8] This study discusses the extent to which this is true. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Arneson, 766 F.3d 774, 796 (8th Cir. 2014); see also Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
But consider a second example, Lunney v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain (2015) 2015: Damon Root, Over Ruled: The Long War for the Control of the U.S. [read post]
