Search for: "GRAVES v. STATE"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 2,426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2011, 7:37 am
In return, review of sentencing claims already decided by the state courts should be boosted from the present so-called "deference" standard to the Stone v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm
However, politics and the human cost aside, what ifan adversary (both state and non-state actor) does exploit the current global crisis of massmigration due to globalization, war, and political unrest? [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 2:45 pm
An interesting decision from the Colorado Court of Appeal, Doumbouya v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:09 am
In Neulinger & Shuruk v Switzerland [2011] 1 FLR 122, the Grand Chamber held that the return of a child from Switzerland to Israel would breach ECHR, art 8. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 2:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:18 am
In Locke v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:56 am
See People v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 11:24 am
Judge Pryor characterized the panel majority’s opinion as a “grave error,” stating that the decision “threatens the very viability of class actions in this circuit. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
See Graves. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 8:27 pm
The panel holds that ”Beck [v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:52 pm
This could spell some trouble for the taxpayers in Nestle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:52 pm
This could spell some trouble for the taxpayers in Nestle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 10:20 pm
The duty imposed on the state in such circumstances is to take measures within their powers which, judged reasonably, might be expected to avoid that risk. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:59 pm
Or, as the owners of the Mail on Sunday have accepted in this week’s agreed court statement: “There was no truth in these very grave allegations”. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:04 am
In addition, the People expressed grave doubts about the fitness of juror No. 5, stating that "his calling the police and being involved in the investigation and his failing to disclose that [fact] . . . has demonstrated that he is highly unqualified . . . to be a juror in this particular matter. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:44 am
The Stolen Valor case, United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:21 am
If based on the subjective measure, i.e., the defendant's own knowledge, grave danger to others must have been apparent and the defendant must have chosen to run the risk rather than alter [his or her] conduct so as to avoid the act or omission which caused the harm’ (quotations and citations omitted).Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:33 pm
The 11th Circuit issued United States v. [read post]
