Search for: "London v. State"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 3,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2007, 11:19 am
.: Courts do have jurisdiction over captives of the multi-national force Prawfsblawg reports on Omar v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:23 pm
On 3 June 2020 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors [2020] UKSC 23. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), which my organization, the Institute for Justice, litigated, is of course a prime example. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:35 am
This state of affairs is problematic for two reasons. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
[2016] EWHC 188 (Pat) is about the most recent practice direction which aligns the UK regime with the fast-approaching UPC's stated intention that all cases will be done and dusted within a year. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 6:17 am
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia during a recent visit to London. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:58 pm
City of New London and in state cases such as Goldstein v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
This duty does not require the state toinitiate a particular investigation; its obligations are met by ensuring that there is a suitable system in place.[2] However, in England and Wales, the traditional style of inquest, as considered in the case of R v HM Coroner for North Humberside and Scunthorpe, Ex p Jamieson,[3] is a significant means by which the state meets this obligation. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:22 am
The then Lord Justice Neuberger was one the Court of Appeal judges in the seminal 2005 privacy decision in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29-30 April. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 11:38 am
YR, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Lambeth (2022) EWHC 2813 (Admin) Ms YR had applied to Lambeth as homeless. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
London Borough of Southwark & Anor v Transport for London, heard 24-25 Oct 2018. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 7:00 am
See Castillo v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
Annual meeting and diversity conference Time: 21st January 2020, 9.00 to 17.00 Place: Kilburn & Strode at Lacon London, 84 Theobalds Road, London WC1X 8NL. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 8:18 am
Supreme Court arguments in Winter v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
The problem for Newham is/was that their allocations policy states that allocations medical assessments are to be done in-house by an officer as part of a particular team. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:37 am
In the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, Tucows.Com Co v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
The problem for Newham is/was that their allocations policy states that allocations medical assessments are to be done in-house by an officer as part of a particular team. [read post]
