Search for: "Michael Dorf"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2018, 7:26 am
Here's the series of tweets sent by me: Michael Dorf posted some thoughtful reactions on "Diversifying Academic Panels" here. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 4:37 am
Briefly: At Verdict, Michael Dorf discusses next month’s oral arguments in Hall v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:16 am
Michael Dorf has a very helpful initial take on the alternative readings of Twombly that are already framing that debate. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:10 am
Supreme Court Unsure If Fourth Amendment Even Applies (Nick Sibilla, Forbes) In Gratuitously Attacking Marriage Equality, Clarence Thomas Accidentally Raised an Important Question About the Scope of Religious Liberty (Michael Dorf, Verdict) We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 3:48 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Michael Dorf suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts’ year-end report on the federal judiciary shows that Roberts “may be a closeted never-Trumper. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:19 pm
Balkin, Yale Law School Panelists: Michael C. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 4:51 pm
Michael Dorf expresses concern about the court addressing he issues of severability, should the court strike down the individual mandate. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:19 pm
See, for example, Michael Dorf.) [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 6:15 am
Dorf, Robert S. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:45 pm
Dorf wrote an article for Verdict this week arguing that the incident may have been a showing of excessive force. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:55 am
At Justia’s Verdict, Michael Dorf argues that the case made by Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas against the dormant Commerce Clause in Comptroller v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 8:36 am
Said Columbia Law professor Michael Dorf: “The claim by judges that they have no use for law review articles seems to me an anti-intellectual know-nothingism that is understandable but regrettable.” [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 6:15 am
Dorf, Robert S. [read post]
2 May 2019, 4:08 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Michael Dorf looks at three cases that ask whether federal law protects employees from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender identity; he maintains that because “there are straightforward reasons to think that discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity is sex discrimination,” “[t]he pending Title VII cases … pose a test for the Court’s conservative majority. [read post]
30 May 2007, 7:05 am
Supreme Court has struck down several loitering statutes, but it has never considered the issue of loitering for the purpose of begging, and whether prohibiting it violates the First Amendment, said Michael Dorf, professor of constitutional law at Columbia University. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:20 pm
Times editorial flays Stand Your Ground, but dodges its (non)-application to Martin/Zimmerman case; Washington Post blasts same law, doesn’t seem to realize Florida homicide rate has gone down not up; chronology as of Sunday’s evidence [Frances Robles, Miami Herald] On the disputed facts of the case, it would be nice if NYT corrected its misreporting [Tom Maguire, more, yet more] Lawprof Michael Dorf vs. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:02 am
Briefly: In his column for Findlaw, Michael Dorf explores the “hidden complications” of Senator Leahy’s proposed bill that would “permit a majority of the Court to designate a retired Justice to substitute for a recused Justice in any particular case. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:52 am
At Dorf on Law, Mike Dorf argues that the status of disparate impact claims under Title VII is “an ambiguity in anti-discrimination law” at the heart of the case. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:32 am
At the Huffington Post, Ediberto Roman argues that affirmative action must be upheld, while at Dorf on Law Mike Dorf offers an alternative explanation of why the “critical mass” argument in Fisher may be valid. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:04 am
Michael Dorf weighs in on federalism-related arguments in a column for Verdict and a post at Dorf on Law. [read post]
