Search for: "People v. Lines"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 12,005
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2012, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:47 am
The DSM-V website is live as of today. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:31 am
This line of thinking was expressly rejected in the Backpage litigation over state laws that required verification that people depicted in prostitution ads were over 18. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:18 am
In People v Collins, the court of appeals held that Michigan courts have jurisdiction over “victimless” offenses committed by non-Indians on Indian lands located within the state. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 1:46 pm
Some people are claiming it did. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:01 am
The refund arises because they had taxes withheld and paid estimated taxes in amounts exceeding the tax liability.When people want to know whether or not they are paying income tax, they need to look at the line on the return that shows “tax liability. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 12:05 am
Also, had it been lawyers who were forced to line up on the steps, the sentence would have read "forced them to line up on the steps," or maybe "forced the lawyers to stand in line for once like normal people. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am
No citizen may be arrested except by decision of a people’s court or with the sanction of a people’s procuratorate. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
” Otherwise, there would never be an occasion to test whether an old precedent remains good law.Where is the line between permissible test legislation and impermissible defiance of existing precedent for no other reason than harassment of people who want to exercise their rights? [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Ryan and Trevino v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:27 pm
Eurodif and United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm
This court searches for specks of religious discrimination buried in a bureaucracy when deciding whether LGBTQ people have the right to purchase wedding services (Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm
The court based its findings on, among other evidence, two expert reports and it found that Terentyev had negatively influenced public opinion “with the aim of inciting social hatred and enmity, escalating social conflict and controversy in society and awakening base instincts in people”, calling for the “physical extermination” of police officers by ordinary people. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
It highlights the difficult position in which higher education institutions find themselves, treading a careful line between compliance with Prevent and the preservation of British universities as bastions of free speech and robust debate. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
Similarly, in U.S. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:27 am
" (People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1 [1981]). [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:23 am
See Lucas v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am
It is not the job of teachers (notwithstanding the mandatory abuse reporting requirements) to dig up evidence to prosecute people. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:39 am
Is there online chatter from possibly knowledgeable people about the underlying incident? [read post]
